Click here for larger and more complete plans from the 1920 USSB ship register: Sheet 1, Sheet 2, Data
Click here for similar plans from International Marine Engineering, July 1917: Sheet 1, Sheet 2
Design 1001 ships delivered as barges and as hulls without engines are illustrated on the page for Design 1113 converted barges.
Click on the photographs below to prompt larger views of the same images.
|
Notes: Theodore E. Ferris was an independent naval architect in New York with a thriving practice when on 27 April 1917 General Goethals asked him to become a naval architect and consulting engineer for the new Emergency Fleet Corporation. Under this appointment he became the final technical authority for approval or rejection of all plans and designs for ships which were submitted by shipbuilders bidding for EFC contracts, which had to receive his approval before construction contracts were awarded. His most important work, however, was the standardization of plans and specifications for both steel and wooden vessels. He personally completed designs and specifications for eight types of steel vessels (Designs 1019, 1020, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1026, 1029, 1033) and two types of steel tugs (1035, and 1036), and reviewed and accepted standardized designs of ship-builders for four more types of steel ships (1025, 1027, 1032, and probably 1034) and two of steel tankers (1030 and 1031). There was also the "Ferris type" wooden cargo ship (Design 1001). Ferris relinquished his office in early 1918 but remained active with the EFC through the end of the war as a consultant. [www.marinelink.com/history/theodore-eferris] In May 1917 Ferris published the "Specifications for the construction of a standard wooden steamship, hull only, for the USSB/EFC" in two versions, a "Yellow Pine Ship" to be built on the East and Gulf Coasts and a "Douglas Fir Ship" to be built on the West Coast. The two types required different schedules of timber to be supplied by the sawmills because certain sizes were available in only one of the woods, leading to minor design differences. (Each southern yellow pine ship required 1,531,410 board feet of lumber according to the Lumber Trade Journal, and the number was probably similar for Douglas fir.) By this time most large wooden ships had some metal reinforcement to control torsional strains, and in his design Ferris provided a lattice of diagonal 4-inch wide iron straps on the outside of the hull from 12 feet forward of the forward hold to 12 feet aft of the after hold and extending from the top of the sides around and under the turn of the bilge. The straps were riveted at the top to an 8-inch wide iron top belt and the straps were also riveted together where they crossed. The ships were fitted with accommodations for a crew of 30 and a Goveernment gun crew of 12. The specifications included the statement that "Twin-screw and geared turbine steam propelling machinery may be substituted subject to approval of owners [the EFC]," and one builder adopted the twin screw option, for which see Design 1001-TS. Specifications: Design 1001 (Ferris, Yellow Pine Ship, for East and Gulf Coast builders). Wood hull. Deadweight tons: 3500 designed, 3588 actual. Dimensions: 281.8' oa, 268.0' pp x 46.0' ext, 45.2' mld x 23.9' load. Propulsion: 1 screw, 1 triple expansion engine, 2 EFC standard watertube boilers, 1400 IHP, 10 knots. Configuration: 1 deck probably with 'tween deck beams, 2 holds, 4 hatches. (from a USSB plan) Specifications: Design 1001 (Ferris, Douglas Fir Ship, for West Coast builders). Wood hull. Deadweight tons: 3500 designed, 3563, 3575, and 3688 actual. Dimensions: 281.5' oa, 268.0' pp x 46.0' ext, 45.2' mld x 26' depth mld, 23.5' draft load. Propulsion: 1 screw, 1 triple expansion engine, 2 single-ended Scotch or watertube boilers, 1400 IHP, 10 knots. Configuration: 1 deck with 'tween deck beams, 2 holds, 4 hatches. (from Ferris's specifications for the "Douglas Fir Ship") |

| USS Banago (Design 1001, EFC Hull 332). This Ferris-type ship was built by the Alabama D.D. & S.B. Co. of Mobile, Ala. She is probably shown here soon after her completion in September 1918. This ship was in commission in the Navy from September to December 1918. (U.S. National Archives, RG-19, 19-N-14856) (Click photo to enlarge) |
Design 1001 ships delivered as barges and as hulls without engines are illustrated on the page for Design 1113 converted barges.